The Resurrection Men


In 1822, a Middleton man kept the body of his infant daughter for six weeks at home before allowing her to be buried. He wanted to be sure that decomposition had set in and was sufficiently advanced to avoid the interest of the Resurrectionists.
On the face of it, you might imagine the Resurrectionists a minor religious sect. When you think of a man keeping a dead child at home until her body had begun to rot, you might think something pretty ghoulish was going on.
Not so!
As soon as you say, `the Resurrection Men`, it begins to take on a more sinister note. The soubriquet is grimly ironic - this was nothing to do with intimations of immortality. It was to do with the trade in dead bodies, the provision of cadavers for anatomical purposes  in the colleges of medicine. And the man who kept his daughter`s body at home? He wanted to be sure that her mortal remains would be beyond usefulness, hoping by this means to feel assured that she would lie peaceful in her grave.
The practice was, it seems, both widespread and lucrative.  During the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, the only bodies legally permitted for medical use were those whose crimes merited a sentence of punishment `by execution and dissection`. However, as the number of capital sentences fell and as the needs of science increased, there was a problem of supply and demand, and this is where the resurrection men came in.
What were the risks?
Remarkably few.
However morally outrageous it might seem, the theft of a body was classed as a `misdemeanor` and not a `felony`, and as such carried a much lighter punishment. It was also, it seems, something on which the authorities tended to turn a blind eye.
The term body-snatching was also commonly used, though again this is misleading. The bodies weren`t snatched, as one might snatch a handbag;  though individual practitioners had, no doubt, their own tricks of the trade, the bodies were secretly retrieved from their resting place, usually at night, and, with equal stealth, conveyed to their destination in the anatomist`s laboratory or his lecture room.
Grave-robbing is another term again. This refers not to the taking of bodies but to the theft of jewelry or any other precious items buried with the deceased. It is quite likely, it would seem reasonable to guess, that one went with the other! Though a resurrection man might think twice, as the punishment for such thefts was classed as a felony – more serious than stealing the body itself!
The Burkers [after Burke and Hare] brought a new dimension to the trade, for they made light work of supplying the bodies by murdering them rather than waiting for them to die and be buried!
It was The Anatomy Act of 1832 which provided for unclaimed bodies and those whose relatives gave permission, to be given over for medical purposes, thus putting an end to the Resurrectionists` trade, though leaving them with a place in the more macabre pages of our history.
John Wheatley`s novel “Canky`s Trade” is set in the south Lancashire township of Middleton in 1811. Lord Byron, pursuing a legal entitlement which he had in nearby Rochdale, stayed at Hopwood Hall, close to Middleton in September of 1811, and the story is partly to do with Byron`s impact on the people he meets there. 1811 was also a year when the infamous Luddites were at large, and whose  destructive resistance to new machinery prompted the Frame-breaking Bill, which Byron was to oppose in the House of Lords. And it was in the middle of the period when Oliver Canky, sexton of the parish churchyard, plied his `trade`. Throw in a young local weaver and poet, Sam Bamford, a murdered prostitute and some strange goings on in the cellar of the isolated house of Canky`s friend, `Owd Scrat`, and there you have the basic ingredients of the story….
 
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00G70KY7G

Comments

Popular Posts